 |
| Marco Rubio - the warlord |
We heard from him yesterday from a speech at some oxymoronic "conservative think-tank"; two terms that really don't go together. “Force used with clear, achievable objectives must always remain a part of our foreign policy toolbox,” he said.
I think our last war with "clear, achievable objectives" ended about 70 years ago. Past that, and possibly with the exclusion of Korea, our little adventures as Spartans for the World have been anything but.
We spend more than the rest of the world combined on our military for what possible reason? So warlords like Marco the wannabe Commander in Chief can always keep the military option on the table?
Really?