"Hairtech International Inc. is seeking $35 million in damages — 10 times what she was apparently paid under the contract. The fraud and breach-of-contract suit cites the heiress' partying as contrary to Hairtech's marketing campaign".
Here is the story just in case putting a feather down your throat after a big meal no longer does it for you.
This of course begs the question as to why on God's green earth anyone, any company would pay this vapid creature of the media $3.5 million to wear a company's hair extensions?
Here is the story just in case putting a feather down your throat after a big meal no longer does it for you.
This of course begs the question as to why on God's green earth anyone, any company would pay this vapid creature of the media $3.5 million to wear a company's hair extensions?