Comments are no longer being accepted? ahhh the early rising liberal

on

Well you left wing liberal idiots.  Now you've gone and done it.  Like our friend in the picture we have constructed a track you can't run on and you've been thrown in the proverbial ditch.  THE NYTIMES, BY 730 IN THE MORNING ISN'T TAKING ANY MORE COMMENTS ON THEIR COLUMNS BECAUSE THEY ARE OVER-RUN WITH THEM (COMMENTS).

DAY LATE A A DOLLAR SHORT.

First we have Senator 41 from Massachusetts. He is a guy, the turd in the punch bowl of life, running on the platform of being the filibuster proof vote in the senate...Senator I can stop anything from Massachusetts. My God. Nice going there.

And the Supreme Court with campaign finance...now corporations are humans.  What in the world?  Sure. Corporations have opinions and sure their fortunes are tied to who is in office...just ask the republicans how tied they are.  Now they can run rampant and if Goldman Sacks tosses a billion or so into political advertising to "explain" why they need more money and that a couple of NY senators are keeping them from reaching down your throat to extract your innards, well, they just need a 40 million dollar NY media buy to present their case. Chump change.

And you, Mr. President. Dammit GROW SOME would you?  You are President of the United States not Mr. Concensus  There is NO CONCENSUS.  There is no bipartisanship.  You meet the GOP halfway and they just move back to their square one.  How many times do you have to see it to believe it.  Mr. President, with all due respect and humility, KICK SOME ASS AND STOP BEING A WIMP OR PUT YOUR WIFE IN CHARGE.

Comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM

    "And the Supreme Court with campaign finance...now corporations are humans. What in the world?"

    I just think that you should know that this isn't something that has just "now" happened. Corporations have been considered "persons" for the purposes of contract since the early days of the republic, based on the case of Darthmouth College v. Woodward, in 1819.

    Corporations have been considered "persons" for the purposes of other substantive rights under the 14th Amendment since 1886's Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad.

    There's also a federal statute that states that corporations are "persons" under the law. 1 USC sec. 1.

    Here's a good Wikipedia article on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood_debate

    In other words, it's not new, and shouldn't get a "what in the world"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Opus One MediaNovember 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM

    for the purposes of campaigns and elections yes it is new...rther it is a distinction now drawn...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment